3 - Story-a-Day - 3
Page 1      Page 2      Page 3      Page 4      Page 5

I n f o r m a t i o n

What exactly IS "Story-a-Day"?  Well, Story-a-Day (also known as "Story-A-Day") is my goal to read one story every day from Ann Charters' collection "The Story and Its Writer" (5th Ed.) which is quite an amazing collection of short stories from around the world.  So here is a list (alphabetical, for that's how they appear in the book) of the stories I've read beginning June 5, 2004.  I'll include an excerpt before any comments.

New! Click on the names (on this side of the dashed line) to find more info on the writer!

Day 51:

Mavis Gallant - "1933" - 1987

    Of course, M. Grosjean did not know that all the female creatures in his house were frightened and lonely, calling and weeping.  He was in Parc Lafontaine with Arno, trying to play go-fetch-it in the dark.

    Nobody understands me when I say that I love the sentimentality of post-modernism.  Just because something is self-aware and at odds with your existent notion of literature doesn't mean it can't be filled with wonder and love.  The realism of this piece, a snapshot of the year 1933, heightens our receptiveness to such a small slice of the characters' lives.  How much do you need to make a story?  What is a story?  Two girls and their mother rent a portion of a house in Montreal; the landlord plays with his dog.
    The perspective of this story is fascinating because although the reader is led to believe that it is objective, it can only come from the older daughter, Berthe.  Of course, it came from the godhead, from the author, but the narration is far from omniscient and it could easily be reasoned that Berthe is looking back on the year—choosing to overlook her father's death—and trying to remember everything but the emptiness she felt.  It was this year when she had to become a young woman, caring for her sister, Marie, and with M. Carette gone, Berthe would have many new responsibilities.  She would slightly resent this to be sure.  Her anger wouldn't be diverted by necessity like her mother's, nor would it be forgotten as Marie's would.  And the landlady, Mme. Grosjean, had already given up on happiness; she has no story to tell.  No, it is Berthe who has a longing as she looks through the rain-soaked window on the Rue Cherrier, a longing that can only be satiated by putting the little pieces together.  Her confessor—that priest?  Priests never make decent writers because they always mix their stories up.

Top


Day 52:

Gabriel Garcia Marquez - "A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings" - 1955

    The angel was the only one who took no part in his own act.  He spent his time trying to get comfortable in his borrowed nest, befuddled by the hellish heat of the oil lamps and sacramental candles that had been placed along the wire.  At first they tried to make him eat some mothballs, which, according to the wisdom of the wise neighbor woman, were the food prescribed for angels.

     I say this is rather Kafka-esque but not so brusque, with a sincerity that comes from the superfluous words, an objective narrator who is just a little aloof and terribly biased.  (rts-no)  When I came upon that fellow Conrad I couldn't foresee something as radically simple as all this.  Have you read One Hundred Years of Solitude?  It got a good write-up in Vanity Fair, I think.  Remember that guy, Gregor Samsa—who woke up as a humongous bug?!  Oh, yes.  The old man—I thought he was going to die in the hen house.  I certainly saw that the spectacle would pass (who would have thought due to a giant spider-woman!) but I never thought he'd fly away like...oh, who was that chap...yes, Icarus, who flew too close—no that was his father's name.  What was his son's name?  Dear, I think Icarus was the son and Daedalus was the father.  Nonetheless, it was horrid about the vulture imagery; just think—an angel with black, torn wings!  I never!  Wait...Daedalus?  Well then who was Theseus?  My uncle Roger had a Greek coin—a reproduction, I'm sure—with some sort of little head on one side and a horse on the other.  It rather sounds like a meteor shower: the Thesieds.
     Translation by Gregory Rabassa.

Top


Day 53:

Charlotte Perkins Gilman - "The Yellow Wallpaper" - 1892

    But there is something else about the paper—the smell!  I noticed it the moment we came into the room, but with so much air and sun it was not bad.  Now we have had a week of fog and rain, and whether the windows are open or not, the smell is here.

     "John laughs at me, of course, but one expects that in marriage."  "The Yellow Wallpaper" is a clever first person narrative from a woman suffering a form of post-partum depression.  It shows a wife's submission to her physician husband's orders with a defiant undercurrent: she must continue to write.  Much has been said of Gilman's feminist slant in this story (much of it apt and correct), but I'm interested by something I'd never noticed before (perhaps I've been trained).  The narrator slowly slips into a form of madness in which she envisions crawling women in the lines of the wallpaper—actually sees them moving around the room.  People—critics/students/readers—have lauded Gilman for trying to present a woman's perspective, but without giving her her full authorial due.  What I'm verbosely trying to say is that Gilman's story is analyzed as a women's story and not as a writer's story.  This is just how things work if you're in the minority of the canon.  People first focus on what makes you different and then they see that you're wonderful in your own right.
     Now, imagine you're suffering from depression, locked in a prison-like bedroom all day (away from your newborn baby).  Imagine you began seeing apparitions and inexplicable movements around the room.  Do you, now and then, take your pen to the page to keep an account of it?  Most people take this narrative device for granted because they're trying to see Gilman's feminist point, but it's a terribly interesting thing to me: the compulsion to write.  Slipping into madness, the narrator feels that writing may help her: "Personally I believe that congenial work, with excitement and change, would do me good."  She issues a caveat: "but it does exhaust me a good deal..."  I'm reminded of Derrida and his notion of Plato's Pharmakon, of how a remedy sometimes brings one further into sickness before health.  In a way, the narrator's act of writing affirms what she sees and what she experiences, so that it justifies her fears and makes her "hysteria" worse.  At the same time it's her only defense, the only way she can contest her imprisonment.  Though Gilman herself lived through her early depression well enough to write this story, the narrator falls completely into madness by the end of the story, suggesting that this may be an inevitable end for those who are compelled by some unknown force to write.  Just look at the next author who, Charters tells us, "died, insane, at the age of forty-three."

Top


Day 54:

Nikolai Gogol - "The Overcoat" - 1840

    After taking out the overcoat, he looked at it with much pride and holding it in both hands, threw it very deftly over Akaky Akakievich's shoulders, then pulled it down and smoothed it out behind with his hands; then draped it about Akaky Akakievich somewhat jauntily.  Akaky Akakievich, a practical man, wanted to try it with his arms in the sleeves, too.  In fact, it turned out that the overcoat was completely and entirely successful.

     This is one of those stories.  I don't want to make sweeping statements like, "It's the best in here," or "Put it under your pillow at night," but it's so meaty (21 pages in this edition) that includes commentary on everything (by which I mean czarist Russia, government, society, work, people, emotions, life, economy) and in the meanwhile tells a good story.  Leave it to me to be fascinated with the narrator who, at times, cannot remember pithy details ("our memory is beginning to fail sadly") and finds it necessary to justify his/her own existence: "We have reported it here so that the reader may see for himself that it happened quite inevitably...."  Anyway, what Gogol does in these twenty-one pages is amazing but requires a careful eye.  You'll be busy fussing with the story on the first one or two reads, so take your time with it.  Let the aroma linger on the roof of your mouth.
     Poor Akaky needs an overcoat, saves for one, has it made and then gets it stolen.  Who stole it?  Sidewalk thieves?  Or are they a metaphor for the oppressive (and extravagant) government?  What is with the Person of Consequence, and why does it take his reformation to stop the corpse of Akaky Akakievich?  Is respect and understanding all that we require to turn humanity into something decent?  Why are there lapses in the narration, as if the style changes for a quick second?  Nabokov (who had much more relevant things to say) wrote this: "Russian progressive critics sensed in him the image of the underdog and the whole story impressed them as a social protest.  But it is something much more than that.  The gaps and black holes in the texture of Gogol's style imply flaws in the texture of life itself.  Something is very wrong and all men are mild lunatics engaged in pursuits that seem to them very important while an absurdly logical force keeps them at their futile jobs—this is the real 'message' of the story."  I must start griping now that none of Nabokov's stories made it into The Story and Its Writer.  Gripe.
     Translation by Constance Garnett.

Top


Day 55:

Nadine Gordimer - "Country Lovers" - 1980

    When the farmer's son was home for the holidays she wandered far from the kraal and her companions.  He went for walks alone.  They had not arranged this; it was an urge each followed independently.  He knew it was she, from a long way off.  She knew that his dog would not bark at her.

     The mind is a peculiar thing.  Why in the midst of such a methodical and gossamer undertaking it should suddenly and without notice fail, no one can truly say.  There are those that would hazard a guess: that it may have to do with the extant fragility of this one's particular gray matter; that it is something about with the number "54" and its mythical tradition (at the moment I can only think of "Car 54, Where Are You?" but this is my deficiency); that Gordimer's poignant tale somehow pushed him over the edge.  Nonetheless, we should not "guess" about matters which will likely never be resolved; it is much like purchasing a lottery ticket for a drawing that won't take place.  What we do know is that here—perhaps before reading this story or after it—our subject, our author extraordinaire, regrettably lost his mind.  This doesn't sound paramount in the grand scheme of things since we hear of this acquaintance or that suffering such an outcome almost daily, but it will mean an end to these interesting trifles.  I am sorry to say so, really.  That I am now forced to write an entry for a story I have only skimmed (I do wish authors would stop using "alternative" name varieties, Nobel laureates notwithstanding), is something that deeply troubles me and I wish the burden could be shifted back upon the poor sap who alighted upon this collection so many months ago.
     So, in brief: yes, this is a "touching" story.  It is likely to be emotionally moving.  Impossible love and Romeo & Juliet and Othello and all that.  Set in South Africa, where Gordimer was born.  I can scarcely find out its arc, though, its rising action, falling action and all of those rudiments imparted upon me by Mr. Hodges, my eighth grade English teacher; perhaps it has other merits as a story of which I am completely unaware (I will be the first to admit that I am not up to date with the literary "scene").
     Continue your warm wishes and good thoughts for our tortured soul.  It is no chance that he was so fascinated with insanity (see poor Gogol).  We have a tendency to unknowingly concentrate on those illnesses we have likely contracted.  Fifty-four will have to do, then.  If I can hire a copyist or a scrivener I may be able to continue with terse excerpts; otherwise the end is now.

Top


Day 56:

Nathaniel Hawthorne - "My Kinsman, Major Molineux" - 1832

    "Nay, the Major has been a-bed this hour or more," said the lady of the scarlet petticoat; "and it would be to little purpose to disturb him to-night, seeing his evening draught was of the strongest.  But he is a kind-hearted man, and it would be as much as my life's worth, to let a kinsman of his turn away from the door.  You are the good old gentleman's very picture, and I could swear that was his rainy-weather hat.  Also, he has garments very much resembling those leather—But come in, I pray, for I bid you hearty welcome in his name."

     Man, you leave the helm for ONE minute and you're a "goner" in the eyes of the world.  I really need someone else to housesit for me while I'm away.  The orchid can wait a few days.  Sorry to disappoint, but there are still roughly seventy stories to go; the book stops for no one.  And let me say that I've already compiled a list of collections to follow Charters'.
     Henri-Georges Clouzot, the French director, said in a 1971 interview that murder mysteries have a way of suspending your belief of certain traits that would otherwise, in a psychological drama, be blatant.  I tend to agree with him.  But Hawthorne, who may well be the KING of psychological dramas doesn't necessarily disagree.  After all, Poe thought him a great writer.  There's something else in Hawthorne's deeply "allegorical" stories, whether "Young Goodman Brown," The Scarlet Letter or this one, "My Kinsman, Major Molineux."
     As one who is particularly interested in the craft of writing, it is amusing for me to note how an author achieves such a force (of psychological mastery in a story).  It is simple: Hawthorne lies to you.  His allegory is formed by a discrepancy in the reader's head after the latter hears, often from a third person "objective" narrator ONE thing but feels another.
     "Molineux" is a story about a young man's preparation for his loss of innocence under the guise of his perpetual decorous honor.  It is Hawthorne's chosen writing style in this story that seems to give young Robin his noble character; add to this that every act of the young man points toward his concupiscence, and you've got a grotesque denouement at which we may expect to find the Major disgraced, but certainly not dear Robin.  This story must be read more than once—preferably more than twice.  How else can one appreciate the nuance of the author's psychological technique?  A voice behind me also suggests that many of Hawthorne's "allegorical" tales are set in the distant past (even for his day) and this too adds to the characters' perceived eminence.  Reread the excerpt above and decide whether the girl seems an honest housekeeper from the Major's house or a harlot eager for business.

Top


Day 57:

Nathaniel Hawthorne - "Young Goodman Brown" - 1835

    Young Goodman Brown came forth at sunset into the street at Salem village; but put his head back, after crossing the threshold, to exchange a parting kiss with his young wife.  And Faith, as the wife was aptly named, thrust her own pretty head into the street, letting the wind play with the pink ribbons of her cap while she called to Goodman Brown.

     Well, it's that "YGB" was published 64 years before "Heart of Darkness" and the latter is just a blown up version of the former plus [insert racism here].  Hawthorne, and what was he a tax collector or a repossessor or something, wrote this—and, yeah, I know, people say it's allegory—"allegorical"—and all that, but what it's got going for it is that Faith, Goodman's wife, is faith itself and is lost when she's lost that night while he's either out bewitching with the devil or asleep dreaming about it.  I don't care what Melville says if it's as deep as Dante or as vexing as Virgil, I think it's good since Goodman's lost his faith not because of what he actually does but for what he doubts.  For doubt is the opposite of faith (the devil is in the details), and somewhat of an impossibility.  I was talking with Davis in Carson City and he said, "You know how you know something?  Like when you put twenty-five cents in your pocket in the morning, and then right as you go to make a payphone call at night you think to yourself, 'I know that I have that quarter.'  Well, the thing is you don't know—it's more instinct than anything, maybe a belief.  It's so because if you stop to think about it for even two seconds before you went grabbing you'd say, 'Well maybe I left it on the counter.'  It's sort of like when you look at a word—'ripen' or 'ham' for example—so long that it doesn't make sense and you doubt that the letters really do anything."  That's what Davis said in Carson City and I sorta think he's on to something because belief and faith and doubt are all different notions completely, though related somehow.  Goodman can believe in evil or he can believe in god or he can believe in both.  But faith is something altogether different.  To put your faith in something you believe in—that's the true measure of Goodman's aim.  Does he ever get there?  Does any mortal man ever get there?  Christ almighty got there but by the skin on his neck!  I even remember Austin telling me that in one of the Gospels he damns the Lord his father as he's crucified.  I looked for it once but without patience (as usual) and didn't find what I was looking for.  I did find Methuselah, the old old guy.  That was back when people lived some nine hundred years.  I wonder what you talk about after nine hundred years.  By then you must know just what's happening with life.  Sam says that when you travel at the speed of light you don't age but a fraction of normal time, so maybe the nine hundred years were like that, just whizzing by so that Methuselah was on his death bed asking his dear wife "Where did the time go?" sad as ever.  His wife?  I don't know, I never found her in there either.

Top


Day 58:

Bessie Head - "Life" - 1977

    A few month's after Life's arrival in the village, the first hotel with its pub opened.  It was initially shunned by all the women and even the beer-brewers considered they hadn't fallen that low yet—the pub was also associated with the idea of selling oneself.  It became Life's favourite business venue.

     I was kind of skeptical at first.  The story didn't seem worthy of assemblage in such a collection, but more like something I'd profoundly enjoy in a magazine (perhaps Atlantic Monthly or the New Yorker) lying on the table in the waiting room at, say, the financial aid office at the local college.  Yes, moments before demanding my equal right to an education, I'd like to have Head's story running through, well, my head.  But Charters' collection is Charters' collection, and if I could profoundly enjoy it in a magazine, there's no reason why I can't enjoy it here.
     Head's story teaches you about another place, and therefore teaches you about yourself.  In fact, "Life" is about togetherness, that clash between one and two, white and black, good and evil, and what results from the conflict.  Life is a series of conflicts (so we choose to see it), and how we make sense of the aftermath is something worth considering.  Too often we yawn from complacence, bask in the normalcy that engulfs us; once in a while it's good to have a unique perspective, for it helps you widen your view.  Not everyone agrees with this, of course.  "My view?  What's the matter with my view?" some might ask.  I personally take pride in my view and in my quest for knowledge and understanding.  I try to exist in a humble state, and insist that what I know is completely inadequate.  Why insist this?  Because I feel it is true.  "Life" serves as a character who lives and dies so we don't have to suffer a similar fate.  But Life did live and she did die.  This fact ought to wake you up and cause you to begin your day as I do mine: by asking yourself how you can change the world while you are busy taking it in.  This balance of input and output forms Head's major theme.

Top


Day 59:

Ernest Hemingway - "Hills Like White Elephants" - 1927

    The hills across the valley of the Ebro were long and white.  On this side there was no shade and no trees and the station was between two lines of rails in the sun.  Close against the side of the station there was a warm shadow of the building and a curtain, made of strings of bamboo beads, hung across the open door into the bar, to keep out the flies.

     There's this collection of Hemingway short stories titled, aptly, "Ernest Hemingway: The Short Stories," (and let me recommend "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber,"—one of the last ones he wrote before his death—and "The Gambler, the Nun, and the Radio," though I've not read the latter; I'm recommending it purely because the title is quite intriguing (I've always had trouble with titles (though a professor of mine (Jones?—no, Walker) once said, "A title is always in a story; you've just got to wrestle it out,")) and must signify a story worth reading.  I bought this collection (about five hundred (average-sized) pages) as a used text (at the campus bookstore) after I read "Hills Like White Elephants" (what a title!) in my English 214 class.  I'd been charged to write a paper on this story, in fact, and I'll fess up and admit that the first time I read it, I had no idea what was going on.  I registered no intensity in Hemingway's austere language (I'll say!) and brushed over "letting the air in" as a reference to "Jig's" operation.  But now—now—oh boy!  This guy has the dialogue down.  The story is almost all dialogue (excepting the intro paragraph and a few anomalies (most of which occur to disarm the tension built between the couple)) with only a couple dialogue tags.  The miracle (not really a miracle considering who wrote it!) is that while reading it, it flows so beautifully that you never get lost, and all the inflection and pronunciation is apparent and natural which adds to the terse realism.  But that paper of mine...whoah!  I don't know what I was thinking (probably still of F.O.C.'s "Everything that Rises Must Converge" or Kafka's "The Metamorphosis").  I got all symbolic (think: cockroach): "...the girl looks off at the line of hills which were white in color, and says, 'They look like white elephants' (756). These 'elephants' might represent pregnant women to her, or show her ability to create life from the earth—either way, it is carefully placed there by Hemingway to enforce Jig’s position on what to do about the baby."  And look how it ended (!): "Hemingway did an excellent job of showing both sides of the story in a unique way."  To my younger self's credit the paper was also on two other short stories; nonetheless..."both sides"?  What was I thinking?  There is only one side to this story: an insensitive man rejecting his girl's worth and forcing her to have an abortion.  (And also let me say that Hemingway is rather sensitive to her plea, for though the language is dry, devoid of emotion and "objective," it's clear that "the American" is arrogant and conceited.)  Oooh, Hempel is coming!) which sits on my bookshelf sandwiched between The Celebrant (perhaps the best baseball novel ever written (The Natural was ruined by the movie—terrible ending!)) and David Foster Wallace's Brief Interviews with Hideous Men.

Top


Day 60:

Amy Hempel - "In the Cemetery Where Al Jolson is Buried" - 1985

    "Tell me things I won't mind forgetting," she said.  "Make it useless stuff or skip it."
    I began.  I told her insects fly through rain missing every drop, never getting wet.  I told her no one in America owned a tape recorder before Bing Crosby did.  I told her the shape of the moon is like a banana—you see it looking full, you're seeing it end-on.

     You know how there are some things that really touch us, and years later when we're reminded of it, we think longingly, "It sure was great but if I came into it again I'd think it was lousy," so we stay away out of the fear of its continual degradation even though everything points to the contrary?  The book Cold Sassy Tree is like that for me.  I first read it in high school.  Hempel's story is like that for me as well.
     The class which required the purchase of The Story and Its Writer didn't require that we read "In the Cemetery..." but one morning, when the instructor was a little late (perhaps he'd left his keys inside the studio of the radio station), I flipped to Hempel's story and read it.  Why?  It looked brief—chopped up and everything.  Short paragraphs that allow pauses (roll call).  But when the class began I couldn't think of anything else.  I thought of chimpanzees, of useless information and of dying.  This story is amazing.
     I have a new theory why people form such an overwhelmingly emotional response to the story (for many people report this effect).  I think that Hempel's narrator successfully shifts her guilt on to the reader, forcing us to not only mourn the loss of her friend, but to atone for all of our shortcomings and inadequacies.  It speaks to the fickleness of life and the surety of death.  And the voice isn't cunning, manipulative; it's simple and to the point.  It is important that the story doesn't end with death: the reader is helped past the loss and toward something different/better/different.  But death, that old sport, looms over the entire story in a realistic, undepressing way.  So why do I feel so depressed?

Top


Day 61:

Langston Hughes - "Thank You, M'am" - 1958

    The woman said, "Um-hum!  You thought I was going to say but, didn't you?  You thought I was going to say, but I didn't snatch people's pocketbooks.  Well, I wasn't going to say that."  Pause.  Silence.  "I have done things, too, which I would not tell you, son—neither tell God, if He didn't already know.  Everybody's got something in common."

    "When I get through with you, sir, you are going to remember Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones."  Hughes, well-known for his poetry, claims he was enlightened to try his hand at short stories after reading a collection by D.H. Lawrence in the 1930s, especially "The Rocking-Horse Winner" (which is in this collection—good story!).  It's wonderful to think of the chain of writers, of inspiration passing from person to person like some magical inanimate spirit.  Instant motivation.  I was motivated last night reading a biography that mentioned 1001 Arabian Nights...for some reason inspiration appeared and the ideas came as a woven chain.  Nothing seems complicated until we think about purpose and temporal causality (when did this start and when will it end?).  For now, let us be content that Lawrence did something for Hughes, as another did something for Lawrence.
    The story is short, its action describing a woman whose purse is almost snatched by a young boy (14 or 15, the story guesses).  Mrs. Luella Bates Washington Jones grabs the perpetrator and starts dragging him down the street.  This is where the story is made.  Purse-snatching: common.  But what happens afterward ?  Anybody's guess.  I won't tell you what Mrs. L.B.W. Jones does in the story, but the paragraph above remains the most important to me.  The boy, who wanted to buy blue suede shoes probably did expect her to say, "...but I didn't snatch people's pocketbooks," and she does, in some sense say this, but what she adds is infinitely more intriguing.  She decriminalizes the boy's actions while maintaining the stance that they were wrong.  By choosing not to see him as a thief, she does for him much more than his absent parents could ever do.

Top


Day 62:

Zora Neale Hurston - "The Gilded Six-Bits" - 1933

    Missie May grinned with delight.  She had not seen the big tall man come stealing in the gate and creep up the walk grinning happily at the joyful mischief he was about to commit.  But she knew that it was her husband throwing silver dollars in the door for her to pick up and pile beside her plate at dinner.  It was this way every Saturday afternoon.  The nine dollars hurled into the open door, he scurried to a hiding place behind the cape jasmine bush and waited.

    Duped.  Taken advantage of.  Looked down upon.  The sidewalk lined with bottles pushed into the dirt.  Ol' gilded four-bit spinnin' his gold 'round flaunting his treasure on a chain like a pirate with gilded teeth, gilded arms, gilded wings...he sinks.
    I am Joe's injured pride.
    "Beauty, cleanliness and order obviously occupy a special position among the requirements of civilization" (Freud, CaiD, 45).
    Infidelity (Latin: fidelus, faithful, trust, truth, veritas).  Compassion and forgiveness—necessarily "aloof"?  Those quotes<—-go out
    I am Missie's shame and disgrace.
    I am four-bits' smashed face.
    A story about love and equality xxx fraternity and equality —- backwards red and white, rouge et blanc but noir is my color all color or no color take your pick
    I am your blatant confusion.
    Ha.

Top


Day 63:

Zora Neale Hurston - "Sweat" - 1926

    "Naw you won't," she panted, "that ole snaggle-toothed black woman you runnin' with ain't comin' heah to pile up on mah sweat and blood.  You ain't paid nothing' on this place, and Ah'm gointer stay right heah till Ah'm toted out foot foremost."

    Hurston seems to choose protagonists that are taken advantage of.  In the case of "The Gilded Six-Bits," both of the main characters are taken advantage of, and since her subjects in general are (comparatively) uneducated blacks, you could argue that their lives are a microcosm of the world at large (country at large?—no).  The injustice done upon them on a domestic level, to Delia Jones, say, mirrors that done to them by the rich, by whites.  These metaphors stretch deep into the fabric of our cosmology when we read Hurston's stories, for they invoke religious comparisons as well as historical remembrances.  The efficacy is measured not by her characters' well-roundedness (for some come across as very flat) but in their patience, their determination to stay on the side of Good rather than fight evil with evil.  The first Joe, in "Six-Bits," desperately wanted revenge, but didn't need to take it because the guilt was felt in Missie May's heart.  Delia Jones never once commits and act of aggression; even in watching her husband die of his wound, we're assured that the doctor is too far away to help. 

Top


Day 64:

Washington Irving - "Rip Van Winkle" - 1819-20

    On waking, he found himself on the green knoll whence he had first seen the old man of the glen.  He rubbed his eyes—it was a bright sunny morning.  The birds were hopping and twittering among the bushes, and the eagle was wheeling aloft, and breasting the pure mountain breeze.  "Surely," thought Rip, "I have not slept here all night."

    All night and more!  Van Winkle's enduring coma (?) has become somewhat of a cultural reference these days.  "I opened the paper and said, 'Who is this that's been elected?—have I been asleep for twenty years?  Have I been "Winkled"?'"  So it goes for poor old Rip.  People tend to see this story for its allegory, so I'll take a different tactic, and try to assess his character (which usually is overlooked to some degree).  Rip Van Winkle is a very unhappy man.  He's always trying to come up with some excuse for Dame Van Winkle, and always trying to get out of his labor on the farm.  He and his dog are terribly persecuted for their inactivity (the former's, anyway).  The narrator (twice removed—very "clever," Irving) tells us of Rip that "the changes of states and empires made but little impression to him; but there was one species of despotism under which he long groaned, and that was—petticoat government."  I think Irving's layered narrators can tell us something about the story we're told: it is inaccurate to the point of pure fantasy.  Rip was dissatisfied at home, and decided to flee to the mountains where he lived in some small organization/cluster of people (this based on his fancy that he'd seen such a group of long-dead men the night before he went to sleep).  The rusty firearm?  A relic he found to bolster his story.
    As a result of his lies (to us, even) he loses any pity he may have garnered for his oppressive domestic life.  And was his wife that bad?  She only grew frustrated because he worked so much for everyone else and neglected his own duties at home.  Rip was fleeing—or dreaming.  "Oh, wouldn't it be nice to go away and come back when Dam Van Winkle is long dead and I can continue my routine?"

Top


Day 65:

Shirley Jackson - "The Lottery" - 1948

    Although the villagers had forgotten the ritual and lost the original black box, they still remembered to use stones.  The pile of stones the boys had made earlier was ready; there were stones on the ground with the blowing scraps of paper that had come out of the box.  Mrs. Delacroix selected a stone so large she had to pick it up with both hands and turned to Mrs. Dunbar.  "Come on," she said.  "Hurry up."

    Born in 1919 right here—well, a few miles down and around the corner—Shirley Jackson went on to write one of the most anthologized stories of..."all time," "the last twenty years," or "high school English textbooks."  "The Lottery" has a theme ubiquitous to the modern reader: that of sacrifice.  In the story it serves as allegory, for the continual acceptance of loss in exchange for modest gains in technology and efficiency.  The story is timeless and not limited to one age.  I rather like Jackson's own commentary on the aftermath of "The Lottery" (which resulted in her receiving many letters):  "Judging from these letters, people who read stories are gullible, rude, frequently illiterate, and horribly afraid of being laughed at."  YES, we are!
    Jackson admits that story flew out of her suddenly, and but for a few minor corrections, is the same story she wrote three weeks prior to its publishing in the New Yorker.  This is far from a common experience among writers.  But the story resonates with readers; they connect with the disturbing message.  Each time we hear of a homeless person freezing under and overpass, a child killed in an auto accident, a civilian hit by a stray bullet or bomb, a people displaced or exterminated, we think of the sacrifices we continually allow.  How many are too many?   Every year we lose millions to something in exchange for this life we take for granted.  Maybe if there were a ritual as described in "The Lottery" people would remember...wouldn't take things for granted.

Top


Day 66:

Henry James - "Paste" - 1899

    The pair of mourners, sufficiently stricken, were in the garden of the vicarage together, before luncheon, waiting to be summoned to that meal, and Arthur Prime had still in his face the intention, she was moved to call it rather than the expression, of feeling something or other.

    James, an established writer and with a brother who, I'm learning, had quite an impact in the fields of psychology and pedagogy, sometimes got lost in those long, drawn-out sentences of his, jungles of words which the reader is expected to miraculously navigate (we in the "biz" call that last clause an "NPA," a construction upon which James draws heavily―that was another).  I'm thinking of that old saying about the forest and the trees (and that Tom Petty song "You folloooow your feelings, you folloooow your dreams...) because it seems as though James' writing is a bit of an impediment for his reader.  Don't get me wrong—I can follow it.  At times I even appreciate the clever way the narrator says something.  But I look at one of those "monster" paragraphs and I say "Kerouac, where are you," because James reminds me that grammar and rules can hurt as much as they can help.  In Of Grammatology, Derrida talks about society's presupposed hierarchy of writing, a fact I heartily accept when I read "Paste" (to Derrida's chagrin).  Because the writing seems subordinate to oral language, distorted and hopelessly tied in a Gordian knot.  I'm sure neither Derrida nor Petty ever thought they'd be mentioned in the same paragraph; alas, it is so.  Sadly, there is an interesting moral dilemma buried in "Paste," one which I haven't time to discuss since I've lost my wind on James' style.  Now that the Heartbreakers are accompanying Mr. Petty on my CD player, I must take my momentum elsewhere.

Top


Day 67:

Gish Jen - "In the American Society" - 1987

    When my father took over the pancake house, it was to send my little sister Mona and me to college.  We were only in junior high at the time, but my father believed in getting a jump on things.  "Those Americans always saying it," he told us.  "Smart guys thinking in advance."  My mother elaborated, explaining that businesses took bringing up, like children.  They could take years to get going, she said, years.

    There's this funny story about a pancake house called "The Muffin Treat" (strange name, huh?) over there on Texas street past marigold (what a flower) over yonder in the county seat of Solano wherein a boy, cash-strapped and hungry, takes his eleven-year-old date 'cross the street for an early dinner 'cause the theater kicked them out of the PG-13 movie.  The boy, his mother having given him just enough for two matinees' worth plus maybe a small sodie and corn, is seriously rationing the funds when his date orders a spaghetti dinner with a salad and a large Pepsi-cola.  He's actually got his wallet out (it was the kind that velcroed around the edges so he had to cough to conceal the sound it made opening) under the table leafing through the bills to see if he can square the cash necessary to get himself a bite to eat.  "And you?" the waitress asks.  There walking by is a boy—nine—carrying dirty plates back into the kitchen.  This bus-boy-boy and the boy on the date are to become step-brothers through the workings of a death-insurance salesman with enough cajones to ask his client out on a date (fifteen years after our story takes place, notice).  "I'll just have a side salad," he says, and then to his date, "I had a big breakfast, you see."  I had a point...what was I talking 'bout?  Oh, yes, in this American society, I was, um.  Seem to have lost my train-a-thought.  What was that movie, anyway?  It was a comedy I seem to remember.  I was sellin' the tickets at the theater and let the little ones pass when my boss comes over and says, "How old you two?" and to this they just look up innocently.  "You can't come into this movie if yore not thirteen.  Are you thirteen?"  She was addressing the boy now.  He mumbled something.  "And you—are you thirteen?"  The girl looked to the boy.  They started walking away but I stopped them.  "Wait," I said, "here's your ticket-money back right quick," and the boy snatched it just as quick as you could imagine, sort of proving he was in charge.  Cindy who did the slushee machine, she was the daughter of Max somebody-or-other and Max was friends with the mom of the boy on the date.  That's how I heard the whole story and what happened.  About the death-insurance thing and all that—well I'm omniscient, ain't I?  I can know things without having to explain how.

Top


Day 68:

Sarah Orne Jewett - "A White Heron" - 1886

    There was hardly a night the summer through when the old cow could be found waiting at the pasture bars; on the contrary, it was her greatest pleasure to hide herself away among the high huckleberry bushes, and though she wore a loud bell she had made the discovery that if one stood perfectly still it would not ring.

    I'm tired of praise.  Have you read these little blurbs?  "Wonderful" this and "amazing" that.  Where are the bad stories?  Do bad stories not exist?  Is every story published good?  NO!  What I can finally point out now that someone else is in charge, is that this is a terrible story.  Thank god for that.
    It's about a girl and a cow and a heron and a hunter.  There's a grandma but she's irrelevant.  The writing is sloppy, the subjects aren't concrete ("There was..."  "There was..." every sentence!), the theme is inconsistent.  In the intro paragraph it said that Jewett pinned down the color of the local talk.  Well good for her!  Maybe she should have been a linguist.
    [I'm still wondering if anything good ever comes out of being negative about something.  There was my great-great-grandmother Perry who told me to hold in mean comments; I guess that's how I got here.  Let me try a little more with this alter-ego.]
    A heron!  Such arbitrary breaks!  I've seen middle-school kids write stories more focused than this.  I mean, seriously, if the works thus far have been 7s, 8s, 9s, and 10s on a scale of 1-10 (10 being the best), this story is a 3, and only gets that rank because the little girl has a chance of falling to her death and prematurely ending the story.  No such luck.  And what was that lady in "The Pearl" by Steinbeck?  What was her deal?
    [No, it doesn't work.  Why take my time to research what makes a bad story?  I know it's bad.  You know it's bad.  What's the point.  Please strike the preceding from the record.  Thank you.]

Top


Day 69:

Charles Johnson - "Menagerie, A Child's Fable" - 1984

    Among the watchdogs in Seattle, Berkeley was known generally as one of the best.  Not the smartest, but steady.  A pious German shepherd (Black Forest origins, probably) with big shoulders, black gums, and weighing more than some men, he sat guard inside the glass door of Tilford's Pet Shoppe, watching the pedestrians scurry along First Avenue, wondering at the derelicts who slept ever so often inside the foyer at night, and sometimes he nodded when things were quiet in the cages behind him, lulled by the bubbling of the fishtanks, dreaming of an especially fine meal he'd once had, or the little female poodle, a real flirt, owned by the aerobic dance teacher (who was no saint herself) a few doors down the street; but Berkeley was, for all his woolgathering, never asleep at the switch.

    Joyce is coming: he'll get the bitterness.  Johnson, unfortunately, deserves praise.  I know, I know, I've got to work on this.  But look at that THIRD sentence up there!  Noun clauses serving as appositionals, as appositives, adjective clauses parenthetically thrown in like they were floating through the air, verbals listed almost instinctively, each one developing the next so that whereas once you had a dog, by the end of the sentence you have a sentient, conscious canine.  I was wondering when animals were going to talk in Charters' blasted collection.  I'm bitter that it took 745 pages.  It's interesting that if an artist works outside the realm of reality, their work is rarely considered "literature"; this work only receives that distinction (I'm guessing) because of its HIGHLY allegorical implications (think Animal Farm).
    It is Monkey who first speaks.  Mr. Tilford, an old-old man, seems to have forgotten about the shoppe—or died—and the animals are beginning to starve.  Monkey convinces Berkeley to let him free since with an opposable thumb and tactile hands he can open the feed bags and distribute the food.  Berkeley frees him.  Monkey in turn frees everyone (except the fish and Tortoise, who chooses to stay inside) and anarchy ensues.  As food gets low, people—animals, I mean—turn on each other.  The most interesting passage explains Berkeley's situation "knowing, finally, that he had the upper hand in the Pet Shoppe, the power.  In other words, bigger teeth.  As much as he hated to admit it, his only advantage, if he hoped to hold the line, his only trump, if he truly wanted to keep them afloat, was the fact that he outweighed them all.  They were afraid of him."
    This story is truly a menagerie (I once went to see a Williams play, The Glass Menagerie, but it was sold out).  It proves non-human animals should talk more in fiction.  Fiction is a suspension of reality—writing is a suspension of reality since even if it's non-fiction, it's still not technically real—so why does writing that breaks a few laws of sense and physics get relegated second-class?  Is it the dime science-fiction trash that gives people a false impression?  Who knows.

I was thinking: how do you write "animals turn on each other" without implying they arouse one another?  Know what I mean?

Top


Day 70:

James Joyce - "Araby" - 1914

    North Richmond Street, being blind, was a quiet street except at the hour when the Christian Brothers' School set the boys free.  An uninhabited house of two storeys stood at the blind end, detached from its neighbours in a square ground.  The other houses of the street, conscious of decent lives within them, gazed at one another with brown imperturbable faces.

    You know what I hate?  Those people that read into things that aren't really there.  "I'm blown away by Mencken's use of the word 'red' on page four since we all know it was his least favorite color, and even though it's mentioned alongside the word 'brick,' it still shows a mastery over language and his ability to overcome his childhood fear of roses."
    Just look at that excerpt from Joyce.  Some people would argue that he labored (or laboured) over every choice in the paragraph; that when he said the street was blind (meaning dead-end), he was describing a metaphoric aspect; that the house being detached might mirror its inhabitants' mental state.  Houses being conscious, gazing at each other—what's that all about?  I don't think Joyce knew a thing about writing, about life, about love and—god, no—epiphanies.  So coin a word—what do I care?
     What we get, in the end, is a twist—like in O. Henry's or Chopin's stories—but when you stop and think about it, there's no startling revelation, there's no "Aha!" moment.  Every word (from the beginning, which in this story is "North Richmond Street, being blind, was a quiet street...") leads to the ending which happens to mark an epiphany for the narrator.  But the reader knew it all along!  We were merely following this boy's self-absorption, making it our own until we were startled into seeing it after some last-line trickery.  Oh, and I suspect "The Dead" is a good story, too.  Right.

Top


Day 71:

James Joyce - "The Dead" - 1914

    Generous tears filled Gabriel's eyes.  He had never felt like that himself towards any woman but he knew that such a feeling must be love.  The tears gathered more thickly in his eyes and in the partial darkness he imagined he saw the form of a young man standing under a dripping tree.  Other forms were near.  His soul had approached that region where dwell the vast hosts of the dead.

    I once dreamt I attended a play based on "The Dead," but such a thing could never be reality because to "attend" something you must be able to retain enough presence of being to "attend" anything, and I scarcely think one of us in a thousand has it today.  Besides, it would have been a terrible play.  How could an audience capture the personal agony Gabriel feels when his wife is longing after a long-dead boy, Michael Furey?  How could we understand, among the commotion of the dinner party, the subtleties and nuances of attraction and lust that swirl around Joyce's text?
    I have read "The Dead" at three points in my life, and each time it hits me in a different place.  The last time (#2), I was deeply interested in the story's discussion of what Gabriel calls "a new generation."  In his toast he mentions their attributes: "hypereducated," lacking "qualities of humanity, of hospitality, of kindly humour which belonged to an older day."  I was interested in how the younger people in the story (Mary Jane, Lily, and perhaps Freddy Malins) are portrayed—both "objectively" and from the limited third-person perspective that sometimes floats near Gabriel.  I searched the document to find Joyce's (or Gabriel's or the narrator's) suggestion of what may be done with these hypereducated, conceited individuals appearing with rapidness in 1914 and commonplace today.
    But I missed something that time.  Gabriel never uses the Browning quote and hence is just as conceited as the people he's accusing during his speech.  Regarding his wife there's a critical divide between the two—so much so that he had never, in his forty-odd years, cared enough to find out about her adolescent love.  And let's not forget his flirting with Lily in the beginning!  Joyce is trying to unravel the repetitive cycle of conservatism and nostalgia that appears in a generation when they are on the wane.  "If only things could be like they were when I was a child...."  In actuality, it appears that the ability to notice the faults of other people hinders your own self-enlightenment.  We would be better off taking care of ourselves than worrying about others.  There is something valuable in the list of attributes in Gabriel's speech.
    On this reading, however, I found myself more aware of the nuances that led to Gretta's miniature breakdown at the end (her death, you could argue).  "O, good-night, Gretta, I didn't see you," says one of the Misses Morkans.  And how before did I miss the fact that she's near-absent for 3/4 of the story?  Gabriel's intriguing character only becomes more so as he falls in love with his wife as she grows more distant, more hollow, more dead.
    And if you think that Joyce's stories are merely based on "epiphanies," I'd say you're missing something.  These stories are based on characters so complex that they are at once completely original and completely universal.  To not identify with some aspect of them is impossible.  I wish I had seen that play so I could find out how this, the last line, came across: "His soul swooned slowly as he heard the snow falling faintly through the universe and faintly falling, like the descent of their last end, upon all the living and the dead."  THAT is a last line.

Top


Day 72:

Franz Kafka - "A Hunger Artist" - 1924

     During these last decades the interest in professional fasting has markedly diminished.  It used to pay very well to stage such great performances under one's own management, but today that is quite impossible.  We live in a different time now.

    This from a speech given by a president:  "...but what's more important, I think, is to look at Kafka's symbolic stance of the artist within society.  People have discussed the community's perspective inward at the hunger artist, but what about the way the hunger artist himself feels about his art?  (And make no mistake about it—though Kafka starts the story speaking in generality—'there were people who...' and 'there were also...'—he soon speaks of one hunger artist in particular...perhaps the last hunger artist, whom we almost project to be the narrator (an impossible conclusion if we are to take the ending as literal within the elapsed metaphor rather than a metaphoric one-upmanship of the rest of the story)).
    "Much is made of the authenticity of the fast—why is this?  The man is in a cage—behind bars!  Yet there are always three men—'usually butchers, strangely enough'—who watch over him.  The necessity is explained soon when Kafka writes that since only the artist himself knows that he cheats not, 'he was therefore bound to be the sole completely satisfied spectator of his own fast.'  Turn 'fast' into 'work of art' and we have something!  But what is cheating in the realm of creation?  Is it stealing ideas?  Is it being artificial, cheap or insincere?  Is there a universal standard to which all artists are held—a code, perhaps, similar to the hunger artist's?
    "Yet we must move on to get somewhere.  And what a gem of a line: 'For he alone knew, what no other initiate knew, how easy it was to fast.'  What does this mean?!  How enigmatic!  The 'martyr,' kept in his cage of his own volition, finds fasting to be second nature.  Again drawing the parallel to art in general, we think of an artist finding their work to be very natural, the logical outcome of their being.  Accordingly, it shouldn't take much of the artist's strength or resources...is this true?
    "There is one last parallel I would like to make, and one likely overlooked by others.  When asserting these claims (as I'm sure many others have before me), people likely contrast starvation to a creative art like writing or painting; the two are connected, but fundamentally different, for the latter results in the production of something (the creation), while the former results in the gradual ruining of something (its destruction).  But I suggest the two are one in the same; any artist knows this.  The creation—the act of creating—at once so easy and effortless, is as draining as it is necessary.  As a piece is appropriated for art, it is lost from within the soul.  There it lies: an externalized bit of non-reality suddenly real and exposed.  And to grapple with the ideals of Truth, Beauty, Love...to find meager and fleeting answers for eternal questions—how can this not make one helpless?  I choose this point to remind you that Kafka asked that his work be burned upon his death, and that he suffered quite a miserable life (though in some ways this reaffirmation of our hypothesis is unnecessary).
    "The hunger artist's last breath is used telling his overseer (God??) two things: 1. That he shouldn't admire the fasting because, he says, 'I have to fast, I can't help it.' and 2. He can't help it because 'I couldn't find the food I liked.  If I had found it, believe me, I should have made no fuss and stuffed myself like you or anyone else.'  Here we have the artist as an alienated being, choosing his work over madness (though madness and death inevitably waiting), ignoring the pleasant, simple life in favor of one spent in agonizing contemplation.  In many ways it is a curse to lose your ignorance, and here Kafka argues it is a curse to be inflicted with the disease of creativity.
    "On matters of national security, however..."
    Who would have known?
    Translation by Willa and Edwin Muir.

Top


Day 73:

Franz Kafka - "The Metamorphosis" - 1915

     They grew quieter and half unconsciously exchanged glances of complete agreement, having come to the conclusion that it would soon be time to find a good husband for her.  And it was like a confirmation of their new dreams and excellent intentions that at the end of their journey their daughter sprang to her feet first and stretched her young body.

    Overheard from a round table discussion of seventh-graders who read "The Metamorphosis" one night previous:
    "...topic.  If that's the case we should pick his injuries instead.  I'm with Alison about that.  Because why does Gregor seem incapable of healing when his oppressive father issues a blow, and yet heals instantaneously when his dear sister Grete shows him any affection?"
    "You have to admit, though, that Carlos had a point when he mentioned the 'Three Part' paper.  I'm going with that one because it's still an enigma for me.  You have this completely surreal and fanciful beginning in which a young man awakens as a 'gigantic insect,' and yet as the story moves on you're dealing with material that's disturbing and macabre.  It's almost like the allegory disappears and we're to take the events at face value."
    "Yeah."
    "Yup."
    "It's interesting, but it's not everything.  I want something about the symbolism.  I mean, a dung beetle?  Why?"
    "You mean cockroach."
    "No, it never says cockroach.  It says 'gigantic insect' and later the charwoman calls him a dung beetle."
    "She could be wrong."
    "And what did she do with his body?"
    "That's not my point.  As I was saying: symbol.  Why a dung beetle?  Why an apple in his back—that's such a powerful image: the red apples falling around him, collecting in a pile.  Why three lodgers?  Are they wise men christening the appearance of something?"
    "I think they were rude when Grete was playing the violin."
    "Wasn't it interesting how Gregor dragged himself all the way out there for her music when he was almost dead?"
    "Remember Billy Crystal in The Princess Bride and his 'almost dead' stuff?"
    "If you write about that—the three lodgers, I mean—you could use that line 'Was he an animal, that music had such an effect on him?'  That's a great line."
    "We're all animals."
    "How about this, though.  I noticed a bunch of cool things at the end of the cockroach story regarding 'A Hunger Artist.'"
    "He wasn't a cockroach.  He had a neck."
    "Whatever.  That line: '"I'm hungry enough," said Gregor sadly to himself, "but not for that kind of food.  How these lodgers are stuffing themselves, and here I am dying of starvation!"'  It reminds me of what [the teacher] said about the hunger artist as feeling a compulsion toward deprivation."
    "I'm writing about love."
    "Love?  Everybody hates him."
    "He's in love with his sister."
    "Yuck."
    "Only you would see that."
    "It's there.  He's dreaming about her after he hears the violin music, and he starts thinking about the future.  'He would never let her out of his room, at least, not so long as he lived; his frightful appearance would become, for the first time, useful to him; he would watch all the doors of his room at once and spit at intruders; but his sister should need no constraint, she should stay with him of her own free will; she should sit beside him on the sofa, bend down her ear to him and hear him confide that he had had the firm intention of sending her to the Conservatorium....'"
    "I got you all.  The 'metamorphosis' isn't Gregor but his sister.  The whole Gregor bit is a distraction."
    "You can't prove any of that in the paper."
    "How does Gregor change in the story?  His eyesight grows dimmer, his voice becomes less recognizable.  But what else?  He stops eating?  His change is sudden—it happens in the first line of the story.  But whose change occupies the last line? [see above excerpt]"
    "Wow."
    "No, that's just, like, your opinion or something."
    "I'm writing on that.  It's Grete's rejection of Gregor that enables her to move on, to finally live life, to stop being a girl and start being a young woman."
    "But what about Gregor!?  What about his loss, his rejection, his pathetic character?  He wastes away under his father's tyranny.  'The Metamorphosis' is a tract on the perils of communism."
    "What?  What the hell are you talking about?  The Soviets entered Prague in 1945.  Czechoslovakia was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire when Kafka wrote this story."
    "Aren't empires communist?"
    "No."
    "They're oppressive, though."
    "I thought they had a parliament?"
    "Britain has a parliament and [the teacher] said they're socialists."
    "What does Cisleithania have to do with any of this?  I thought the translation terrible."
    "Yeah, run-ons everywhere."
    "Maybe that was Kafka?"
    "Right."
    Translation by Willa and Edwin Muir.

Top


Day 74:

Jamaica Kincaid - "Girl" - 1978

     ...soak salt fish overnight before you cook it; is it true that you sing benna in Sunday school?; always eat your food in such a way it won't turn someone else's stomach; on Sundays try to walk like a lady and not like the slut you are so bent on becoming; don't sing benna in Sunday school; you mustn't speak to wharf-rat boys, not even to give directions; don't eat fruits on the street—flies will follow you; but I don't sing benna on Sundays at all and never in Sunday school...

    "Girl" is, like this here, just one single solitary sentence comprised of a string of independent clauses (many of these are dependent, however), all of which are directions from a judgmental mother to her burgeoning daughter who only manages to get two clauses of her own into this jungle of aphorisms that ultimately climaxes with the girl accused of being "the kind of woman who the baker won't let near the bread," though this is really no fault of hers as the reader sees it in the story, which, at this point, has haughtily dealt with every necessary aspect of life and culture in this place—Antigua?—from the mother's perspective, dealing mainly with lessons on becoming a respectable, feminine woman capable of domestic tasks and "not like a slut," a theory which we can neither confirm nor deny even though the story leaves one with the feeling that the girl has been wronged and harshly judged—oppressed really—for no good reason other than the fact that in some ways life must do that, must be harsh, and the techniques of living must be transmitted from one stubborn generation to another no matter what degree of reluctance accompanies the listener's closed mind (and boy wouldn't semicolons be easier).

Top


Day 75:

W. P. Kinsella - "Shoeless Joe Jackson Comes to Iowa" - 1979

     "And how did he get a name like Shoeless Joe?" I would ask my father, knowing the story full well but wanting to hear it again.  And no matter how many times I heard it, I would still picture the lithe ballplayer, his great bare feet white as baseballs sinking into the outfield grass as he sprinted for a line drive.  Then, after the catch, his toes gripping the grass like claws, he would brace and throw to the infield.

    I could complain about the over-descriptiveness or the completely unnecessary image of Annie's nipples poking through her shirt or I could talk about my little league experience.  I could argue that Kinsella has all the trademarks of a "popular" writer: he's image-driven, oscillates between experience and memory in an unintentionally fractured manner; the formula for the story is―rather than internal―covering the piece like an exoskeleton.  Then again, I could tell you about the bird and my broken toe and this boy Joey who could throw seventy miles an hour at age eleven.  I could go into the whole "Field of Dreams" angle, Kevin Costner, "Waterworld," "The Postman Always Rings Twice"―NO―"Il Postino"―NO―"Going Postal"―NO―whatever that mail movie was of Costner's...OR I could tell you about the Ding-Dongs, the post-win pizza parties, the yearly trophies that have ended up as a collection of faux marble bases (plastic tops discarded) in my basement.  There is Shoeless Joe, the Blacksox scandal―even Ty Cobb.  There is Kinsella's use of the scandal (the throwing of the 1919 world series) as allegory and then the vague role of the narrator's father.  How about heaven and its relation to the ball field?  Or the time I hit a line drive into some poor kid's eye causing the game to be called in the third inning (they didn't have anymore players)?  How about Don, the coach whose job was professional paper delivery-man?  There was this girl who put her hair up when she played on our team and even wore a cup so the ump would think her a boy―what was her name?  How about father as mentor, as coach??  Heck, I can't decide.  You pick.

Top


Page 1 /\/\/\/ Page 2 /\/\/\/ Page 3 /\/\/\/ Page 4 /\/\/\/ Page 5 /\/\/\/ Info

 


Writing Home

Page 1
A - Ca

Page 2
Ca - Ga

Page 3

Mavis Gallant
Gabriel Garcia Marquez
Charlotte Perkins Gilman
Nikolai Gogol
Nadine Gordimer
Nathaniel Hawthorne
Hawthorne #2
Bessie Head
Ernest Hemingway
Amy Hempel
Langston Hughes
Zora Neale Hurston
Hurston #2
Washington Irving
Shirley Jackson
Henry James
Gish Jen
Sarah Orne Jewett
Charles Johnson
James Joyce
Joyce #2
Franz Kafka
Kafka #2
Jamaica Kincaid
W. P. Kinsella

Page 4
La -Oc

Page 5
Ol -Wr

Info Page
 

Page 3 statistics:

25 stories

21 authors

276 pages

4 translations

14 ♂ / 11 ♀


 

Irkland
1998-2007